keys: fix race with concurrent install_user_keyrings()
authorDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Tue, 12 Mar 2013 05:44:31 +0000 (16:44 +1100)
committerPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Mon, 10 Feb 2014 21:11:15 +0000 (16:11 -0500)
commit3e7f0a70958c7f5ed9bc684bc6601cf398c8c948
tree75ce9cf20bd3ad1223a6ebd40ba0647233af3693
parent149646e70aa6a325b5e9656a4a70b82f1d7d4014
keys: fix race with concurrent install_user_keyrings()

commit 0da9dfdd2cd9889201bc6f6f43580c99165cd087 upstream.

This fixes CVE-2013-1792.

There is a race in install_user_keyrings() that can cause a NULL pointer
dereference when called concurrently for the same user if the uid and
uid-session keyrings are not yet created.  It might be possible for an
unprivileged user to trigger this by calling keyctl() from userspace in
parallel immediately after logging in.

Assume that we have two threads both executing lookup_user_key(), both
looking for KEY_SPEC_USER_SESSION_KEYRING.

THREAD A THREAD B
=============================== ===============================
==>call install_user_keyrings();
if (!cred->user->session_keyring)
==>call install_user_keyrings()
...
user->uid_keyring = uid_keyring;
if (user->uid_keyring)
return 0;
<==
key = cred->user->session_keyring [== NULL]
user->session_keyring = session_keyring;
atomic_inc(&key->usage); [oops]

At the point thread A dereferences cred->user->session_keyring, thread B
hasn't updated user->session_keyring yet, but thread A assumes it is
populated because install_user_keyrings() returned ok.

The race window is really small but can be exploited if, for example,
thread B is interrupted or preempted after initializing uid_keyring, but
before doing setting session_keyring.

This couldn't be reproduced on a stock kernel.  However, after placing
systemtap probe on 'user->session_keyring = session_keyring;' that
introduced some delay, the kernel could be crashed reliably.

Fix this by checking both pointers before deciding whether to return.
Alternatively, the test could be done away with entirely as it is checked
inside the mutex - but since the mutex is global, that may not be the best
way.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Reported-by: Mateusz Guzik <mguzik@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: James Morris <james.l.morris@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
security/keys/process_keys.c