md/raid10: fix two bugs in handling of known-bad-blocks.
authorNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Mon, 13 Jan 2014 23:38:09 +0000 (10:38 +1100)
committerBen Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Sat, 15 Feb 2014 19:20:16 +0000 (19:20 +0000)
commit b50c259e25d9260b9108dc0c2964c26e5ecbe1c1 upstream.

If we discover a bad block when reading we split the request and
potentially read some of it from a different device.

The code path of this has two bugs in RAID10.
1/ we get a spin_lock with _irq, but unlock without _irq!!
2/ The calculation of 'sectors_handled' is wrong, as can be clearly
   seen by comparison with raid1.c

This leads to at least 2 warnings and a probable crash is a RAID10
ever had known bad blocks.

Fixes: 856e08e23762dfb92ffc68fd0a8d228f9e152160
Reported-by: Damian Nowak <spam@nowaker.net>
URL: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68181
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
drivers/md/raid10.c

index 8bba438a328e1793cd6c75596e00d9add358e814..c61067a9240cec9f4f1b0f3449533baa6a238702 100644 (file)
@@ -997,7 +997,7 @@ read_again:
                        /* Could not read all from this device, so we will
                         * need another r10_bio.
                         */
-                       sectors_handled = (r10_bio->sectors + max_sectors
+                       sectors_handled = (r10_bio->sector + max_sectors
                                           - bio->bi_sector);
                        r10_bio->sectors = max_sectors;
                        spin_lock_irq(&conf->device_lock);
@@ -1005,7 +1005,7 @@ read_again:
                                bio->bi_phys_segments = 2;
                        else
                                bio->bi_phys_segments++;
-                       spin_unlock(&conf->device_lock);
+                       spin_unlock_irq(&conf->device_lock);
                        /* Cannot call generic_make_request directly
                         * as that will be queued in __generic_make_request
                         * and subsequent mempool_alloc might block