Unionfs: file_release must always succeed
authorErez Zadok <ezk@cs.sunysb.edu>
Wed, 17 Sep 2008 15:41:28 +0000 (11:41 -0400)
committerErez Zadok <ezk@cs.sunysb.edu>
Fri, 12 Aug 2011 02:38:47 +0000 (22:38 -0400)
Why does f_op->release return an int if the VFS ignores it?!

Signed-off-by: Erez Zadok <ezk@cs.sunysb.edu>
fs/unionfs/commonfops.c

index 214ad86e481b969015cf8f22656d6808a4446419..5938adf9cfa8de46b1217f915715cc948a6fbfa5 100644 (file)
@@ -656,15 +656,15 @@ int unionfs_file_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
        unionfs_lock_dentry(dentry, UNIONFS_DMUTEX_CHILD);
 
        /*
-        * Yes, we have to revalidate this file even if it's being released.
-        * This is important for open-but-unlinked files, as well as mmap
-        * support.
+        * We try to revalidate, but the VFS ignores return return values
+        * from file->release, so we must always try to succeed here,
+        * including to do the kfree and dput below.  So if revalidation
+        * failed, all we can do is print some message and keep going.
         */
        err = unionfs_file_revalidate(file, parent,
                                      UNIONFS_F(file)->wrote_to_file);
-       if (unlikely(err))
-               goto out;
-       unionfs_check_file(file);
+       if (!err)
+               unionfs_check_file(file);
        fileinfo = UNIONFS_F(file);
        BUG_ON(file->f_path.dentry->d_inode != inode);
        inodeinfo = UNIONFS_I(inode);
@@ -705,7 +705,6 @@ int unionfs_file_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
        }
        kfree(fileinfo);
 
-out:
        unionfs_unlock_dentry(dentry);
        unionfs_unlock_parent(dentry, parent);
        unionfs_read_unlock(sb);