KVM: x86/pmu: Update AMD PMC sample period to fix guest NMI-watchdog
authorLike Xu <likexu@tencent.com>
Sat, 9 Apr 2022 01:52:26 +0000 (09:52 +0800)
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Wed, 27 Apr 2022 12:41:15 +0000 (14:41 +0200)
commit 75189d1de1b377e580ebd2d2c55914631eac9c64 upstream.

NMI-watchdog is one of the favorite features of kernel developers,
but it does not work in AMD guest even with vPMU enabled and worse,
the system misrepresents this capability via /proc.

This is a PMC emulation error. KVM does not pass the latest valid
value to perf_event in time when guest NMI-watchdog is running, thus
the perf_event corresponding to the watchdog counter will enter the
old state at some point after the first guest NMI injection, forcing
the hardware register PMC0 to be constantly written to 0x800000000001.

Meanwhile, the running counter should accurately reflect its new value
based on the latest coordinated pmc->counter (from vPMC's point of view)
rather than the value written directly by the guest.

Fixes: 168d918f2643 ("KVM: x86: Adjust counter sample period after a wrmsr")
Reported-by: Dongli Cao <caodongli@kingsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Like Xu <likexu@tencent.com>
Reviewed-by: Yanan Wang <wangyanan55@huawei.com>
Tested-by: Yanan Wang <wangyanan55@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
Message-Id: <20220409015226.38619-1-likexu@tencent.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h
arch/x86/kvm/svm/pmu.c
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c

index 7a7b8d5b775e9173c71eb23d1504542a7e119b4d..5e7e8d163b985fb8a8407b118413716a029fb905 100644 (file)
@@ -140,6 +140,15 @@ static inline u64 get_sample_period(struct kvm_pmc *pmc, u64 counter_value)
        return sample_period;
 }
 
+static inline void pmc_update_sample_period(struct kvm_pmc *pmc)
+{
+       if (!pmc->perf_event || pmc->is_paused)
+               return;
+
+       perf_event_period(pmc->perf_event,
+                         get_sample_period(pmc, pmc->counter));
+}
+
 void reprogram_gp_counter(struct kvm_pmc *pmc, u64 eventsel);
 void reprogram_fixed_counter(struct kvm_pmc *pmc, u8 ctrl, int fixed_idx);
 void reprogram_counter(struct kvm_pmu *pmu, int pmc_idx);
index ba40b7fced5ae12c9d73d340f20bd7fa494d0ee5..b5b0837df0d118535dfcc750ffd73db389c98257 100644 (file)
@@ -257,6 +257,7 @@ static int amd_pmu_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
        pmc = get_gp_pmc_amd(pmu, msr, PMU_TYPE_COUNTER);
        if (pmc) {
                pmc->counter += data - pmc_read_counter(pmc);
+               pmc_update_sample_period(pmc);
                return 0;
        }
        /* MSR_EVNTSELn */
index 5fa3870b898810ff828e23a39b76dad451ef542e..a0c84761c938292a9a10e80e5595ab49f0c3acf4 100644 (file)
@@ -431,15 +431,11 @@ static int intel_pmu_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
                            !(msr & MSR_PMC_FULL_WIDTH_BIT))
                                data = (s64)(s32)data;
                        pmc->counter += data - pmc_read_counter(pmc);
-                       if (pmc->perf_event && !pmc->is_paused)
-                               perf_event_period(pmc->perf_event,
-                                                 get_sample_period(pmc, data));
+                       pmc_update_sample_period(pmc);
                        return 0;
                } else if ((pmc = get_fixed_pmc(pmu, msr))) {
                        pmc->counter += data - pmc_read_counter(pmc);
-                       if (pmc->perf_event && !pmc->is_paused)
-                               perf_event_period(pmc->perf_event,
-                                                 get_sample_period(pmc, data));
+                       pmc_update_sample_period(pmc);
                        return 0;
                } else if ((pmc = get_gp_pmc(pmu, msr, MSR_P6_EVNTSEL0))) {
                        if (data == pmc->eventsel)