bpf: Update selftests to reflect new error states
authorDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Thu, 29 Apr 2021 22:08:39 +0000 (22:08 +0000)
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Sun, 2 May 2021 09:05:04 +0000 (11:05 +0200)
commit d7a5091351756d0ae8e63134313c455624e36a13 upstream.

Update various selftest error messages:

 * The 'Rx tried to sub from different maps, paths, or prohibited types'
   is reworked into more specific/differentiated error messages for better
   guidance.

 * The change into 'value -4294967168 makes map_value pointer be out of
   bounds' is due to moving the mixed bounds check into the speculation
   handling and thus occuring slightly later than above mentioned sanity
   check.

 * The change into 'math between map_value pointer and register with
   unbounded min value' is similarly due to register sanity check coming
   before the mixed bounds check.

 * The case of 'map access: known scalar += value_ptr from different maps'
   now loads fine given masks are the same from the different paths (despite
   max map value size being different).

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Reviewed-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
[fllinden@amazon - skip bounds.c test mods, they won't change error msg on 5.4]
Signed-off-by: Frank van der Linden <fllinden@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds_deduction.c
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds_mix_sign_unsign.c
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/unpriv.c
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/value_ptr_arith.c

index c162498a64fc6a0644903bde7255304690af66b7..91869aea6d6414acfb34bd9caa52968c2e7f0303 100644 (file)
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
                BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
                BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
        },
-       .errstr_unpriv = "R0 tried to sub from different maps, paths, or prohibited types",
+       .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has pointer with unsupported alu operation",
        .errstr = "R0 tried to subtract pointer from scalar",
        .result = REJECT,
 },
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
                BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0),
                BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
        },
-       .errstr_unpriv = "R1 tried to sub from different maps, paths, or prohibited types",
+       .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has pointer with unsupported alu operation",
        .result_unpriv = REJECT,
        .result = ACCEPT,
        .retval = 1,
                BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
                BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
        },
-       .errstr_unpriv = "R0 tried to sub from different maps, paths, or prohibited types",
+       .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has pointer with unsupported alu operation",
        .errstr = "R0 tried to subtract pointer from scalar",
        .result = REJECT,
 },
 {
        "check deducing bounds from const, 4",
        .insns = {
+               BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1),
                BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
                BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSLE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1),
                BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
                BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSGE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1),
                BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
-               BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0),
+               BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_0),
                BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
        },
-       .errstr_unpriv = "R1 tried to sub from different maps, paths, or prohibited types",
+       .errstr_unpriv = "R6 has pointer with unsupported alu operation",
        .result_unpriv = REJECT,
        .result = ACCEPT,
 },
@@ -61,7 +62,7 @@
                BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
                BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
        },
-       .errstr_unpriv = "R0 tried to sub from different maps, paths, or prohibited types",
+       .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has pointer with unsupported alu operation",
        .errstr = "R0 tried to subtract pointer from scalar",
        .result = REJECT,
 },
@@ -74,7 +75,7 @@
                BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
                BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
        },
-       .errstr_unpriv = "R0 tried to sub from different maps, paths, or prohibited types",
+       .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has pointer with unsupported alu operation",
        .errstr = "R0 tried to subtract pointer from scalar",
        .result = REJECT,
 },
@@ -88,7 +89,7 @@
                            offsetof(struct __sk_buff, mark)),
                BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
        },
-       .errstr_unpriv = "R1 tried to sub from different maps, paths, or prohibited types",
+       .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has pointer with unsupported alu operation",
        .errstr = "dereference of modified ctx ptr",
        .result = REJECT,
        .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
                            offsetof(struct __sk_buff, mark)),
                BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
        },
-       .errstr_unpriv = "R1 tried to add from different maps, paths, or prohibited types",
+       .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has pointer with unsupported alu operation",
        .errstr = "dereference of modified ctx ptr",
        .result = REJECT,
        .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
                BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
                BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
        },
-       .errstr_unpriv = "R0 tried to sub from different maps, paths, or prohibited types",
+       .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has pointer with unsupported alu operation",
        .errstr = "R0 tried to subtract pointer from scalar",
        .result = REJECT,
 },
index 9baca7a75c42ae8db9918745824b4b944a05911a..c2aa6f26738b4181d8e944916a04d09cb0def051 100644 (file)
@@ -19,7 +19,6 @@
        },
        .fixup_map_hash_8b = { 3 },
        .errstr = "unbounded min value",
-       .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds",
        .result = REJECT,
 },
 {
@@ -43,7 +42,6 @@
        },
        .fixup_map_hash_8b = { 3 },
        .errstr = "unbounded min value",
-       .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds",
        .result = REJECT,
 },
 {
@@ -69,7 +67,6 @@
        },
        .fixup_map_hash_8b = { 3 },
        .errstr = "unbounded min value",
-       .errstr_unpriv = "R8 has unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds",
        .result = REJECT,
 },
 {
@@ -94,7 +91,6 @@
        },
        .fixup_map_hash_8b = { 3 },
        .errstr = "unbounded min value",
-       .errstr_unpriv = "R8 has unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds",
        .result = REJECT,
 },
 {
        },
        .fixup_map_hash_8b = { 3 },
        .errstr = "unbounded min value",
-       .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds",
        .result = REJECT,
 },
 {
        },
        .fixup_map_hash_8b = { 3 },
        .errstr = "unbounded min value",
-       .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds",
        .result = REJECT,
 },
 {
        },
        .fixup_map_hash_8b = { 3 },
        .errstr = "unbounded min value",
-       .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds",
        .result = REJECT,
 },
 {
        },
        .fixup_map_hash_8b = { 3 },
        .errstr = "unbounded min value",
-       .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds",
        .result = REJECT,
 },
 {
        },
        .fixup_map_hash_8b = { 3 },
        .errstr = "unbounded min value",
-       .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds",
        .result = REJECT,
 },
 {
        },
        .fixup_map_hash_8b = { 3 },
        .errstr = "unbounded min value",
-       .errstr_unpriv = "R7 has unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds",
        .result = REJECT,
 },
 {
        },
        .fixup_map_hash_8b = { 4 },
        .errstr = "unbounded min value",
-       .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds",
        .result = REJECT,
 },
 {
        },
        .fixup_map_hash_8b = { 3 },
        .errstr = "unbounded min value",
-       .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds",
        .result = REJECT,
-       .result_unpriv = REJECT,
 },
index 0d621c841db143d12f36ef2c5eb7a3a48463c51c..c3f6f650deb762bfd7eeacb38883c16e528955bd 100644 (file)
        BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, -8),
        BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
        },
-       .errstr_unpriv = "R1 tried to add from different maps, paths, or prohibited types",
+       .errstr_unpriv = "R1 stack pointer arithmetic goes out of range",
        .result_unpriv = REJECT,
        .result = ACCEPT,
 },
index 00b59d5d7a7f0cdbbee66f133690829d4cadccc2..28d44e6aa0b7ea0de30e2e111676691c9e09854c 100644 (file)
@@ -21,8 +21,6 @@
        .fixup_map_hash_16b = { 5 },
        .fixup_map_array_48b = { 8 },
        .result = ACCEPT,
-       .result_unpriv = REJECT,
-       .errstr_unpriv = "R1 tried to add from different maps",
        .retval = 1,
 },
 {
        .fixup_map_array_48b = { 1 },
        .result = ACCEPT,
        .result_unpriv = REJECT,
-       .errstr_unpriv = "R2 tried to add from different pointers or scalars",
+       .errstr_unpriv = "R2 tried to add from different maps, paths or scalars",
        .retval = 0,
 },
 {
        .fixup_map_array_48b = { 1 },
        .result = ACCEPT,
        .result_unpriv = REJECT,
-       .errstr_unpriv = "R2 tried to add from different maps, paths, or prohibited types",
+       .errstr_unpriv = "R2 tried to add from different maps, paths or scalars",
        .retval = 0,
 },
 {